The psychology of counterfactual thinking m andel david r hilton denis j catellani patrizia. The Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking : David R. Mandel : 9780415322416 2019-01-25

The psychology of counterfactual thinking m andel david r hilton denis j catellani patrizia Rating: 5,1/10 1694 reviews

Table of contents for The psychology of counterfactual thinking

the psychology of counterfactual thinking m andel david r hilton denis j catellani patrizia

In support of this possibility, a number of empirical studies have reported a relationship between positive mood and creativity e. They think about the pre-action possibility of being in London and the post-action possibility of being in Paris. You think about a single possibility from the outset to understand the factual conditional; namely, Sam is from Boston and he is a Red Sox fan. Before addressing the question of whether the preference for intentional actions as explanations in causal chains can be explained in terms of the mutability, covariation, sufficiency or crediting causality principles we therefore introduce some distinctions between kinds of causal chain see Table 3. Causal beliefs and reasoning are deeply embedded in many parts of our cognition. As she was waiting for the light to turn green, she reached down to change the radio station. In what we call unfolding causal chains, the successive events follow normally and foreseeably from each other in a directed causal sequence.

Next

The Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking : David R. Mandel : 9780415758659

the psychology of counterfactual thinking m andel david r hilton denis j catellani patrizia

When people revisit previous experiences, they often engage in episodic counterfactual thinking: mental simulations of alternative ways in which personal past events could have occurred. For example, they think about stopping for a beer and they also think about not stopping for a beer. Table of Contents Part 1: Counterfactuals, Causality and Mental Representation. You decide to go to Paris but while you are there your wallet is stolen. Suppose you were asked to list the possibilities that are not consistent with the conditional. You could imagine several alternatives to the facts. Participants read the following story: Reed hates Smith and wants to kill him.

Next

The Psychology Of Counterfactual Thinking

the psychology of counterfactual thinking m andel david r hilton denis j catellani patrizia

These simulations differ from mental simulations in that they are elaborated in public, sharable formats — in narratives, reports, computer programs, and so forth — yet they can be analyzed on the structural dimensions i. The difference between the present results and those of Lockwood et al. In this form of family memory, personal identities could be grounded in the lives of earlier generations prior to the pivotal event. According to Mussweiler, the perceiver initially engages in a holistic assessment of the shared and unique features of the comparison referent and standard. Experiments 1a and 1b showed that conditionals that comprise enabling causes, e. John goes first and picks a black card from his deck.

Next

The psychology of counterfactual thinking

the psychology of counterfactual thinking m andel david r hilton denis j catellani patrizia

The past and present possibilities are the same i. The goal of this Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches is to present an analytical model of the relations of the individual to the group in situations of collaborative knowledge construction. Such inductions aim to establish causal laws that do not refer to particular individuals, places and times as they hold across them. Whether performed automatically or deliberately, counterfactual reasoning may yield a plethora of necessary conditions for the outcome Hesslow 1988. International in scope, and directed at an international audience, applied topics are well represented. In addition, typicality of routine and severity of monetary loss interact to affect victims' anger response to the crime.

Next

David R. Mandel, Denis J. Hilton & Patrizia Catellani (eds.), The Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking

the psychology of counterfactual thinking m andel david r hilton denis j catellani patrizia

Smith 1789; Tetlock 2000, 2002. Whereas counterfactual reasoning is about possibility, causal reasoning is about reality. Thus the study obtained judgments of four types of explanation precondition, distal cause, proximal cause, immediate cause across the three types of distal factor voluntary and deliberate human action, voluntary but not deliberate human action, natural abnormal condition. We discuss the implications for research on post-decisional reactions. Both abnormality and intentionality have also been shown to be major determinants of counterfactual mutability see Kahneman 1995 for a review and this may in part explain why they figure so prominently as causal explanations.

Next

The Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking: 1st Edition (Hardback)

the psychology of counterfactual thinking m andel david r hilton denis j catellani patrizia

We speculate that the fewer constraints placed upon the choice or selection of counterfactual comparison targets encourages and allows the activation of more generalized and varied motivational strategies. Instead, the possibilities they keep in mind are guided by a small set of principles. It also allows us to plan for the future and to learn from our mistakes. Meanwhile, a neighbor drove by the school, waited with Jimmy for fifteen minutes, and then offered to drive the boy home. What are the determinants of counterfactual thinking, and what are its adaptive and psychological consequences? Thus, rating causality first 1 does not make any new events more available for mutation as long as the mutation task also has experimenter-provided alternatives and 2 does not provide information to any mutability-computation function.

Next

The psychology of counterfactual thinking

the psychology of counterfactual thinking m andel david r hilton denis j catellani patrizia

Patrizia Catellani is Full Professor of Social Psychology at the Catholic University of Milan, Italy. Thus, participants would have him available for mutating and they would notice that changing his actions would change the outcome in a big way. They can travel forwards or backwards in subjective time. One day Reed shoots Smith in the head. Bryne Part 2: Functional Bases of Counterfactual Thinking.

Next

The Necessity of God and the Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking

the psychology of counterfactual thinking m andel david r hilton denis j catellani patrizia

His areas of research expertise include thinking and reasoning, judgment and decision making, and social cognition. No Ensino Superior, e apesar das iniciativas desenvolvidas em algumas das instituições nacionais e europeias, há ainda um longo caminho a percorrer para integrar o ensino do pensamento crítico nas unidades curriculares dos diferentes cursos, que passará por uma maior articulação entre o desenvolvimento destas capacidades e os conteúdos de aprendizagem, e ainda pela investigação, criação de parcerias e redes de trabalho que rentabilizem recursos e aumentem o impacto das suas atividades. Below we turn to the question of why these causal preferences emerged. First, the methodology for doing counterfactual thinking research steadily matured. What keeps the mind from experiencing considerable dissonance, I suspect, is its bounded sense of rationality and its pragmatism.

Next

The psychology of counterfactual thinking

the psychology of counterfactual thinking m andel david r hilton denis j catellani patrizia

Thus, the outcome is that neither individual wins anything. However, mean agreement did not differ between the factual and counterfactual conditions — a finding that was replicated in two other experiments cf. The data indicate that this is not so. Thus, a flight missed by five Introduction 3 minutes will likely evoke more disappointment and perhaps more selfrecrimination than a flight missed by thirty minutes because it is easier to imagine having been on the flight in the former case than in the latter. Wegner and Bargh 1998 potentially disturbing comparisons between the simulation and the real world. I argue in this chapter that the normative problems of restitution, as well as the arguments against restitution in this literature, mainly concern restitution for the descendants of slaves or the descendants of colonial subjects, therefore, these arguments cannot be forcefully applied against having restitution in post-communist nations.

Next